4.8 Article

A GRF-GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 11, 页码 1274-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0703-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, NRI Competitive Grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [2017-67007-25939]
  2. International Wheat Partnership Initiative (IWYP)
  3. Argentinean Research Council (CONICET)
  4. Agencia Nacional de Promocion de la Investigacion, el Desarrollo Tecnologico y la Innovacion
  5. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology [ICGEB/ARG17-01]
  6. NIH [GM122968]
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Genes in the Environment Institute Strategic Programme [BB/P013511/1]
  8. Human Frontier Science Program [LT000590/2014-L]
  9. Pew Charitable Trusts
  10. BBSRC [BB/L014130/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential of genome editing to improve the agronomic performance of crops is often limited by low plant regeneration efficiencies and few transformable genotypes. Here, we show that expression of a fusion protein combining wheat GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR 4 (GRF4) and its cofactor GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 1 (GIF1) substantially increases the efficiency and speed of regeneration in wheat, triticale and rice and increases the number of transformable wheat genotypes.GRF4-GIF1transgenic plants were fertile and without obvious developmental defects. Moreover,GRF4-GIF1induced efficient wheat regeneration in the absence of exogenous cytokinins, which facilitates selection of transgenic plants without selectable markers. We also combinedGRF4-GIF1with CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing and generated 30 edited wheat plants with disruptions in the geneQ(AP2L-A5). Finally, we show that a dicotGRF-GIFchimera improves regeneration efficiency in citrus, suggesting that this strategy can be applied to dicot crops. A method to increase plant regeneration efficiency extends gene editing to more species and genotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据