4.8 Article

PIEZO2 in sensory neurons and urothelial cells coordinates urination

期刊

NATURE
卷 588, 期 7837, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2830-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. NIH [R35 NS105067, F32 DK121494, R01 NS108439]
  3. NIH Intramural Research Program funding from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
  4. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PIEZO2 is expressed in the bladder urothelium and sensory neurons innervating the lower urinary tract and is a key mechanosensor for the control of urination. Henry Miller stated that to relieve a full bladder is one of the great human joys. Urination is critically important in health and ailments of the lower urinary tract cause high pathological burden. Although there have been advances in understanding the central circuitry in the brain that facilitates urination(1-3), there is a lack of in-depth mechanistic insight into the process. In addition to central control, micturition reflexes that govern urination are all initiated by peripheral mechanical stimuli such as bladder stretch and urethral flow(4). The mechanotransduction molecules and cell types that function as the primary stretch and pressure detectors in the urinary tract mostly remain unknown. Here we identify expression of the mechanosensitive ion channel PIEZO2 in lower urinary tract tissues, where it is required for low-threshold bladder-stretch sensing and urethral micturition reflexes. We show that PIEZO2 acts as a sensor in both the bladder urothelium and innervating sensory neurons. Humans and mice lacking functional PIEZO2 have impaired bladder control, and humans lacking functional PIEZO2 report deficient bladder-filling sensation. This study identifies PIEZO2 as a key mechanosensor in urinary function. These findings set the foundation for future work to identify the interactions between urothelial cells and sensory neurons that control urination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据