4.8 Article

The future of food from the sea

期刊

NATURE
卷 588, 期 7836, 页码 95-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2616-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. SYSTEMIQ
  2. World Resources Institute
  3. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  4. European Research Council [679812]
  5. ANID [PIA/BASAL 0002]
  6. GAIN-Xunta de Galicia
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [679812] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global food demand is rising, and serious questions remain about whether supply can increase sustainably(1). Land-based expansion is possible but may exacerbate climate change and biodiversity loss, and compromise the delivery of other ecosystem services(2-6). As food from the sea represents only 17% of the current production of edible meat, we ask how much food we can expect the ocean to sustainably produce by 2050. Here we examine the main food-producing sectors in the ocean-wild fisheries, finfish mariculture and bivalve mariculture-to estimate 'sustainable supply curves' that account for ecological, economic, regulatory and technological constraints. We overlay these supply curves with demand scenarios to estimate future seafood production. We find that under our estimated demand shifts and supply scenarios (which account for policy reform and technology improvements), edible food from the sea could increase by 21-44 million tonnes by 2050, a 36-74% increase compared to current yields. This represents 12-25% of the estimated increase in all meat needed to feed 9.8 billion people by 2050. Increases in all three sectors are likely, but are most pronounced for mariculture. Whether these production potentials are realized sustainably will depend on factors such as policy reforms, technological innovation and the extent of future shifts in demand. Modelled supply curves show that, with policy reform and technological innovation, the production of food from the sea may increase sustainably, perhaps supplying 25% of the increase in demand for meat products by 2050.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据