4.6 Article

Effect of tungsten doping on the variability of InZnO conductive-bridging random access memory

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abbeab

关键词

indium-tungsten-zinc-oxide; tungsten doping; CBRAM; oxygen vacancy; NVM

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan [MOST 109-2622-E-009-009-CC1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The doping ratio of tungsten significantly influences the memory characteristics of CBRAM, with 15% tungsten doping ratio showing excellent memory properties such as high cycling endurance, low operating voltage, and good retention capability. Additionally, the electrical uniformity and switching behavior of InWZnO devices are improved as the doping ratio of tungsten in the switching layer increases, indicating great potential for high-performance memory devices based on novel material InWZnO.
The characteristics of conductive-bridging random access memory (CBRAM) with amorphous indium-tungsten-zinc-oxide (a-InWZnO) switching layer and copper (Cu) ion-supply layer were prepared by sputtering. It was found that the doping ratio of tungsten has a significant effect on the memory characteristics of the CBRAM, and the doping of tungsten acts as a suppressor of oxygen vacancies in the InWZnO film. The O 1s binding energy associated with the oxygen-deficient regions in the alpha-InWZnO thin film decreases with increasing tungsten doping ratio, which can be demonstrated by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. When the tungsten doping ratio is 15%, the a-InWZnO CBRAM can achieve the excellent memory characteristics, such as high switching endurance (up to 9.7 x 10(3) cycling endurance), low operating voltage, and good retention capability. Moreover, the electrical uniformity and switching behavior of InWZnO device are evidently improved as the doping ratio of tungsten in the switching layer increases. These results suggest that CBRAM based on novel material InWZnO have great potential to be used in high-performance memory devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据