4.8 Review

How defects influence the photoluminescence of TMDCs

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 29-39

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-020-3037-9

关键词

two-dimensional material; transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs); photoluminescence (PL); defect; defect engineering; quantum yield (QY)

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2017YFA0205700, 2019YFA0308000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61774034, 91963130, 11704068, 61705106]
  4. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20170694]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes and discusses the influence of defects on PL emission in recent research, focusing on fundamental mechanisms such as radiative/nonradiative recombination kinetics and band structure modification. There are challenges and opportunities in the field of defect manipulation, and exploring mechanisms is expected to promote the future applications of 2D TMDCs.
Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) monolayers, a class of ultrathin materials with a direct bandgap and high exciton binding energies, provide an ideal platform to study the photoluminescence (PL) of light-emitting devices. Atomically thin TMDCs usually contain various defects, which enrich the lattice structure and give rise to many intriguing properties. As the influences of defects can be either detrimental or beneficial, a comprehensive understanding of the internal mechanisms underlying defect behaviour is required for PL tailoring. Herein, recent advances in the defect influences on PL emission are summarized and discussed. Fundamental mechanisms are the focus of this review, such as radiative/nonradiative recombination kinetics and band structure modification. Both challenges and opportunities are present in the field of defect manipulation, and the exploration of mechanisms is expected to facilitate the applications of 2D TMDCs in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据