4.7 Article

Metallicity and X-ray luminosity variations in NGC922

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3290

关键词

galaxies: individual: NGC922; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: star formation; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: galaxies

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union/ERC [617001]
  2. European Union [691164]
  3. Chandra X-ray Center (CXC) under National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [NAS8-03060]
  4. ASI through the ASI-INAF [2017-14-H.0]
  5. ESO programme [088.B-0882(A)]
  6. NASA
  7. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [691164] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic study of the metallicity variations within the collisional ring galaxy NGC922 reveals a difference in metallicity between star-forming regions in the bulge and the ring. The study also shows an anticorrelation between X-ray luminosity and metallicity of the sub-galactic regions of NGC922.
We present a systematic study of the metallicity variations within the collisional ring galaxy NGC922 based on long-slit optical spectroscopic observations. We find a metallicity difference between star-forming regions in the bulge and the ring, with metallicities ranging from almost solar to significantly sub-solar ([12 + log(O/H)] similar to 8.2). We detect He I emission in all the studied regions of the bulge and the ring, indicating ionization from massive stars associated with recent (<10 Myr) star formation, in agreement with the presence of very young star clusters. We find an anticorrelation between the X-ray luminosity and metallicity of the sub-galactic regions of NGC922. The different regions have similar stellar population ages, leaving metallicity as the main driver of the anticorrelation. The dependence of the X-ray emission of the different regions in NGC922 on metallicity is in agreement with similar studies of the integrated X-ray output of galaxies and predictions from X-ray binary population models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据