4.7 Article

Monte Carlo simulations of fast Newtonian and mildly relativistic shock breakout from a stellar wind

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3125

关键词

radiative transfer; shock waves; transients: supernovae

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K03878, JP19H00693, JP20H04751]
  2. RIKEN Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Science Program (iTHEMS)
  3. RIKEN pioneering project `Evolution of Matter in the Universe (r-EMU' and `Extreme precisions to Explore fundamental physics with Exotic particles (E3-Project)'
  4. Israel Science Foundation [1114/17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strong explosion of a compact star surrounded by a thick stellar wind drives a fast (>0.1c) radiation mediated shock (RMS) that propagates in the wind, and ultimately breaks out gradually once photons start escaping from the shock transition layer. In exceptionally strong or aspherical explosions, the shock velocity may even be relativistic. The properties of the breakout signal depend on the dynamics and structure of the shock during the breakout phase. Here we present, for the first time, spectra and light curves of the breakout emission of fast Newtonian and mildly relativistic shocks, that were calculated using self-consistent Monte Carlo simulations of finite RMS with radiative losses. We find a strong dependence of the nu F-nu peak on shock velocity, ranging from similar to 1 keV for v(s)/c = 0.1 to similar to 100 keV for v(s)/c = 0.5, with a shift to lower energies as losses increase. For all cases studied the spectrum below the peak exhibits a nearly flat component (F-nu similar to nu(0)) that extends down to the break frequency below which absorption becomes important. This implies much bright optical/ultraviolet emission than hitherto expected. The computed light curves show a gradual rise over tens to hundreds of seconds for representative conditions. The application to SN 2008D/XRT 080109 and the detectability limits are also discussed. We predict a detection rate of about one per year with eROSITA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据