4.6 Article

Enhancement of an In Vivo Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Oleanolic Acid through Glycosylation Occurring Naturally inStauntonia hexaphylla

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 25, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25163699

关键词

anti-inflammatory effect; Lardizabalaceae; oleanane triterpene saponin; Stauntonia hexaphylla

资金

  1. CNU grant from Chungnam National University [2018-1149-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stauntonia hexaphylla(Lardizabalaceae) has been used as a traditional herbal medicine in Korea and China for its anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. As part of a bioprospecting program aimed at the discovery of new bioactive compounds from Korean medicinal plants, a phytochemical study ofS. hexaphyllaleaves was carried out leading to isolation of two oleanane-type triterpene saponins, 3-O-[beta-d-glucopyranosyl (1 -> 2)-alpha-l-arabinopyranosyl] oleanolic acid-28-O-[beta-d-glucopyranosyl (1 -> 6)-beta-d-glucopyranosyl] ester (1) and 3-O-alpha-l-arabinopyranosyl oleanolic acid-28-O-[beta-d-glucopyranosyl (1 -> 6)-beta-d-glucopyranosyl] ester (2). Their structures were established unambiguously by spectroscopic methods such as one- and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopies, high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and chemical reactions. Their anti-inflammatory activities were examined for the first time with an animal model for the macrophage-mediated inflammatory response as well as a cell-based assay using an established macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7) in vitro. Together, it was concluded that the saponin constituents, when they were orally administered, exerted much more potent activities in vivo than their sapogenin core even though both the saponins and the sapogenin molecule inhibited the RAW 264.7 cell activation comparably well in vitro. These results imply that saponins fromS. hexaphyllaleaves have a definite advantage in the development of oral medications for the control of inflammatory responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据