4.6 Article

Unveiling the Differential Antioxidant Activity of Maslinic Acid in Murine Melanoma Cells and in Rat Embryonic Healthy Cells Following Treatment with Hydrogen Peroxide

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 25, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25174020

关键词

antioxidant activity; antioxidant enzymes; anti-proliferative activity; maslinic acid; melanoma; Olea europaeaL; ROS levels

资金

  1. General Secretariat of Universities, Research and Technology of the Ministry of Economy, Innovation, Science and Employment Government of the Junta de Andalucia (Spain) [BIO-157]
  2. program FEDER-INNTERCONECTA from the Spanish Government [C-3650-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maslinic acid (MA) is a natural triterpene fromOlea europaeaL. with multiple biological properties. The aim of the present study was to examine MA's effect on cell viability (by the MTT assay), reactive oxygen species (ROS levels, by flow cytometry) and key antioxidant enzyme activities (by spectrophotometry) in murine skin melanoma (B16F10) cells compared to those on healthy cells (A10). MA induced cytotoxic effects in cancer cells (IC(50)42 mu M), whereas no effect was found in A10 cells treated with MA (up to 210 mu M). In order to produce a stress situation in cells, 0.15 mM H(2)O(2)was added. Under stressful conditions, MA protected both cell lines against oxidative damage, decreasing intracellular ROS, which were higher in B16F10 than in A10 cells. The treatment with H(2)O(2)and without MA produced different responses in antioxidant enzyme activities depending on the cell line. In A10 cells, all the enzymes were up-regulated, but in B16F10 cells, only superoxide dismutase, glutathione S-transferase and glutathione peroxidase increased their activities. MA restored the enzyme activities to levels similar to those in the control group in both cell lines, highlighting that in A10 cells, the highest MA doses induced values lower than control. Overall, these findings demonstrate the great antioxidant capacity of MA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据