4.6 Article

Chemical Fingerprinting and Biological Evaluation of the Endemic Chilean FruitGreigia sphacelata(Ruiz and Pav.) Regel (Bromeliaceae) by UHPLC-PDA-Orbitrap-Mass Spectrometry

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 25, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25163750

关键词

Greigia sphacelata; endemic fruits; UHPLC-PDA-Orbitrap-MS; metabolomic analysis; antioxidant; cholinesterase inhibition

资金

  1. FONDECYT [1180059]
  2. CONICYT PFCHA/beca doctorado nacional [2019-21191978]
  3. CONICYT (PAI/ACADEMIA) [79160109]
  4. [3190794]
  5. [3190572]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Greigia sphacelata(Ruiz and Pav.) Regel (Bromeliaceae) is a Chilean endemic plant popularly known as quiscal and produces an edible fruit consumed by the local Mapuche communities named as chupon. In this study, several metabolites including phenolic acids, organic acids, sugar derivatives, catechins, proanthocyanidins, fatty acids, iridoids, coumarins, benzophenone, flavonoids, and terpenes were identified inG. sphacelatafruits using ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array detection coupled with a Orbitrap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-PDA-Orbitrap-MS) analysis for the first time. The fruits showed moderate antioxidant capacities (i.e., 487.11 +/- 26.22 mu mol TE/g dry weight) in the stable radical DPPH assay, 169.08 +/- 9.81 TE/g dry weight in the ferric reducing power assay, 190.32 +/- 6.23 TE/g dry weight in the ABTS assay, and 76.46 +/- 3.18% inhibition in the superoxide anion scavenging assay. The cholinesterase inhibitory potential was evaluated against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE). From the findings, promising results were observed for pulp and seeds. Our findings suggest thatG. sphacelatafruits are a rich source of diverse secondary metabolites with antioxidant capacities. In addition, the inhibitory effects against AChE and BChE suggest that natural products or food supplements derived fromG. sphacelatafruits are of interest for their neuroprotective potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据