4.7 Article

Urine as a high-quality source of host genomic DNA from wild populations

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 170-182

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13260

关键词

endangered populations; genomic methods; population genetics-empirical; primates

资金

  1. Leakey Foundation
  2. Arizona State University Institute for Human Origins
  3. National Institutes of Health [R35 GM124827, R01 Al120810]
  4. Research Computing at Arizona State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated various sources of genetic material and capture methods in generating genome-scale data from wild eastern chimpanzees, finding that urine is the most promising source of host DNA and exome sequencing is more successful than shotgun sequencing and whole-genome capture in low-quality samples.
The ability to generate genomic data from wild animal populations has the potential to give unprecedented insight into the population history and dynamics of species in their natural habitats. However, for many species, it is impossible legally, ethically or logistically to obtain tissue samples of quality sufficient for genomic analyses. In this study we evaluate the success of multiple sources of genetic material (faeces, urine, dentin and dental calculus) and several capture methods (shotgun, whole-genome, exome) in generating genome-scale data in wild eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) from Gombe National Park, Tanzania. We found that urine harbours significantly more host DNA than other sources, leading to broader and deeper coverage across the genome. Urine also exhibited a lower rate of allelic dropout. We found exome sequencing to be far more successful than both shotgun sequencing and whole-genome capture at generating usable data from low-quality samples such as faeces and dental calculus. These results highlight urine as a promising and untapped source of DNA that can be noninvasively collected from wild populations of many species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据