4.6 Article

Isoflurane promotes proliferation of squamous cervical cancer cells through mTOR-histone deacetylase 6 pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 476, 期 1, 页码 45-55

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-020-03884-7

关键词

Isoflurane; Proliferation; Histone deacetylase 6; Cervical cancer; mTOR

资金

  1. [19331202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isoflurane enhances the proliferation of cervical cancer cells by upregulating histone deacetylase 6 through a mTOR-dependent pathway. The AKT-mediated pathway has no effect on isoflurane-induced expression of histone deacetylase 6.
This study investigated the effect of isoflurane on the proliferation of squamous cervical cancer cells, with focus on histone deacetylase 6 that is closely related to carcinogenesis. Squamous cervical cancer cells SiHa and Caski were exposed to 1%, 2%, or 3% isoflurane for 2 h, respectively. Cell proliferation was measured with the cell counting kit (CCK-8) assay and determined by BrdU assay. Expression of histone deacetylase 6, phospho-AKT, phospho-mTOR, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was assessed by Western blot. In order to block the histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) expression, siRNA transfection was performed. Isoflurane significantly promoted the proliferation of both SiHa and Caski cells, accompanied by upregulation of PCNA protein expression. Isoflurane increased the level of histone deacetylase 6 protein expression in both cells, and knockdown of histone deacetylase 6 attenuated the pro-proliferation effects of isoflurane. Additionally, activation of AKT/mTOR was found after isoflurane treatment, and mTOR inhibition abolished isoflurane-induced histone deacetylase 6 expression. However, inhibition of AKT phosphorylation had no effect on the expression of histone deacetylase 6 mediated by isoflurane. In conclusion, Isoflurane enhanced proliferation of cervical cancer cells through upregulation of histone deacetylase 6, which was associated with mTOR-dependent pathway, but not AKT-mediated pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据