4.7 Article

Rapid defect engineering of UiO-67 (Zr) via microwave-assisted continuous-flow synthesis: Effects of modulator species and concentration on the toluene adsorption

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110405

关键词

Metal-organic framework; UiO-67; Continuous flow; Defect engineering; Modulator; Toluene adsorption

资金

  1. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes [NRF-2017M1A2A2086815, 2017M1A2A2086647]
  2. Engineering Research Center of Excellence Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [NRF-2014R1A5A1009799]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defect engineering is a promising approach for tailoring the physicochemical properties, such as stability, pore structure, and surface area, of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). In this study, some defective Zr-based biphenyl dicarboxylate (UiO-67 (Zr)) MOFs were prepared via fast modulated synthesis under microwave-assisted continuous flow by using HCOOH, CH3COOH, CH3CH2COOH, and C6H5COOH as modulators. A surface-modified UiO-67(Zr) framework with high porosity and crystallinity could be rapidly produced in a few minutes due to the incomplete exchange between the bridging ligand and the modulator. The defect concentration in the products was tuned by controlling both the modulator species and concentrations utilized. The adsorption ability toward toluene of the prepared UiO-67(Zr) MOFs was found to be related to their structural defects; the defective UiO-67(Zr) MOF synthesized with HCOOH as the modulator exhibited the highest toluene adsorption capacity (467 mg g(-1)), surpassing also most of the previously reported adsorbent materials, such as zeolites, activated carbon, Zr-based dicarboxybenzene (UiO-66(Zr)), H2N-UiO-66(Zr), zeolitic imidazolates, and copper benzenetricarboxylate. Moreover, the experimental dynamic adsorption data were mathematically modeled to predict the adsorption behaviors of defective UiO-67(Zr) MOFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据