4.2 Article

Penicillin-Binding Proteins and Associated Protein Mutations Confer Oxacillin/Cefoxitin Tolerance in Borderline Oxacillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureus

期刊

MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 590-595

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0191

关键词

oxacillin; cefoxitin; penicillin-binding proteins; bacterial tolerance; S; aureus

资金

  1. Joint Research Program of Juntendo University, Faculty of Health and Sports Science
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [16K07095, 20K08846]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K08846, 16K07095] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline oxacillin resistance as carrying theblaZ gene and mutations in PBPs, leading to resistance against oxacillin and cefoxitin.
Among clinical isolates ofStaphylococcus aureus, borderline oxacillin-resistantS. aureus(BORSA), which is mildly resistant to oxacillin (OXA) without harboring themecAormecCgene, is considered a risk factor for further resistance against multiple antibiotics. In this study, BORSA isolates and their derivatives were characterized through antibiotic susceptibility testing and mutation analysis of the genes encoding penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and their related proteins, including the promoter region. Eight BORSA isolates were confirmed to harbor theblaZ gene, and hyperproduction ofblaZ-encoded penicillinase was predicted based on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Of these, four derivative strains that were spontaneously selected based on viability on media containing high concentrations of OXA showed higher MICs than the parent isolates. The minimum bactericidal concentrations, MIC ratios, and TDtest results identified many strains with cefoxitin tolerance. Sequencing ofpbp1,pbp2,pbp3,pbp4,gdpP, andyjbH, and the promoter ofpbp4revealed mutations in BORSA isolates and derivatives, despite their absence in parent isolates, suggesting that mutations in PBPs confer OXA/cefoxitin tolerance in BORSA strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据