4.6 Article

Free vibration problem of fluid-conveying double-walled boron nitride nanotubes via nonlocal strain gradient theory in thermal environment

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15397734.2020.1819310

关键词

Nonlocal strain gradient theory; boron nitride nanotube; piezoelectric shell; thermal environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides a comprehensive investigation into the size-dependent free vibration equations of double-walled boron nitride nanotubes in a thermal environment. The motion equations are obtained through the use of nonlocal strain gradient theory and shear deformation theory combined with Hamilton's principle. The Lennard-Jones potential function is used to couple the pair of nanotubes. Softening and hardening effects are also considered. The obtained equations are solved using the differential quadrature method to evaluate the effects of various parameters on the system's eigenfrequency and critical flow velocity.
This article is a comprehensive investigation into the equations of the size-dependent free vibration of a special type of fluid-conveying nanotubes, i.e., double-walled boron nitride nanotubes, in a thermal environment. The motion equations are obtained through the use of nonlocal strain gradient theory for piezoelectric materials combined with the first-order shear deformation theory and Hamilton's principle. Lennard-Jones potential function imposes the coupling between the pair of nanotubes that are bound together via van der Waals forces. This study also considers softening and hardening effects to better understand important aspects of modeling. After setting proper boundary conditions, the differential quadrature method is exploited to solve the obtained equations. This numerical study allows us to evaluate the effects of many parameters that include delta-temperature, aspect ratio, size scale and boundary conditions on the nondimensional eigenfrequency of considered system and critical flow velocity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据