4.7 Article

A robust line-tracking photogrammetry method for uplift measurements of railway catenary systems in noisy backgrounds

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106888

关键词

Line-tracking technique; Noisy background; Non-contact displacement measurement; Railway catenary system; Photogrammetry

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. Norwegian Railway Directorate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For electrical railways, contact wires are used to ensure stable and continuous power supply to trains operating on the infrastructure. One crucial design parameter used to control the catenary design is the vertical displacement. The traditional uplift measuring equipment of catenary systems usually requires that targets are installed on the wire, and/or that measurement devices are mounted on the support structure of catenary systems or temporary poles. These methods require track access and substantial time and manpower for installation and measurement. Thus, a portable vision-based tracking system is proposed to enable remote, non-contact and non-target uplift measurements of catenary systems. The challenge in measuring the catenary displacement is to detect a linear rigid body in a noisy background environment with a high sampling frequency. To detect the displacement, a vision-based system with a novel line-tracking technique is used to achieve robust and accurate measurement. The proposed technique is based on a coarse subset and line search and subpixel detection. The line-tracking method is successfully employed for the identification of the important vertical displacements of a contact wire in front of a noisy background. The accuracy, robustness and applicability of the proposed tracking method are demonstrated through numerical experiments, the field uplift measurement of the railway catenary system and the identification of the contact wire in a diverse city environment. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据