4.6 Article

Adsorption and diffusion of lithium and sodium on the silicon nanowire with substrate for energy storage application: A first principles study

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123243

关键词

Lithium ion battery; Sodium ion battery; Silicon nanowire; Adsorption; Diffusion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China of China [61904073]
  2. Science Foundation of Yunnan Provincial Education Department [2018JS392]
  3. projects of science and technology plans of Kunming [2019-1-C-25318000002189]
  4. Spring City Plan - Special Program for Young Talents
  5. Science Foundation of National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures [M31036]
  6. Talents Introduction Project of Kunming University [YJL18008, YJL16003]
  7. Open Project Program of the Fujian Province Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Application
  8. Applied Basic Research Programs of Yunnan Science and Technology Department [2017FD085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adsorption and diffusion properties of Li/Na on the Si nanowire (NW) with substrate are analyzed by the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The Li/Na prefers to adsorb on the corner of the Si NW with substrate and the adsorption energies on different sites vary from -1.32 eV to -0.74 eV. The diffusion pathways and corresponding energy barriers of lithium/sodium on the Si substrate and sidewall of the Si NW are calculated by the nudged elastic band (NEB) method. Moreover, when Li/Na moves around the Si NW, the Si NW would bend with the maximum displacement of similar to 0.76 angstrom. Finally, the energy barriers are 0.61-0.81 eV when Li/Na diffuses across the Si NW, indicating the Si NW may be applied as anodes in both lithium and sodium ion batteries. This work would help to investigate the Li/Na adsorption and diffusion properties on various nanowires with substrates and provide guidelines for the design of Si anodes in sodium ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据