4.7 Article

TEM analysis of deformation bands created by tensile deformation of superelastic NiTi wires

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110470

关键词

Shape memory alloy; Martensitic phase transformation; NiTi; Transmission electron microscopy; Selected area electron diffraction; Dark field imaging

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [1803834S, 20-14114S]
  2. MEYS of the Czech Republic [LM2018110, CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000760, CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001794]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deformation processes derived from martensitic transformation in shape memory alloys are theoretically fully recoverable in a complete thermomechanical loading cycle across transformation range and do not leave any lattice defects in the microstructure. In reality, this is rarely the case in NiTi, since plastic deformation tends to accompany the martensitic transformation, particularly if it proceeds under large stress. Lattice defects observed in the microstructure of deformed NiTi wires (slip dislocations and deformation bands) attract the attention of researchers, since they are linked to unrecovered strains and play significant role in functional fatigue, shape setting or two-way shape memory effect. In this work, we present an experimental approach allowing for analysis of deformation bands in deformed NiTi consisting in: i) preparation of superelastic NiTi wires with recrystallized, small grained microstructure, ii) subjecting these wires to desired tensile test (e.g. superelastic or shape memory cycle) and iii) characterizing the deformation bands in TEM using selected area electron diffraction combined with dark field imaging following simple rules described in this work. If the deformed microstructure becomes too complex due to the high density and small size of deformation bands, ASTAR orientation mapping can be beneficially applied to reveal the refinement of the microstructure through the introduction of deformation bands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据