4.7 Article

Effect of grape pomace usage in chocolate spread formulation on textural, rheological and digestibility properties

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110451

关键词

Grape pomace; Chocolate spread; Confectionery; Mixture design; Digestibility

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [TOVAG-2170054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, dried grape pomace was successfully used as an alternative ingredient in chocolate spread, leading to changes in formulation and properties such as hardness, spreadability, and phenolic content. This research demonstrates the potential application of dried grape pomace in food products as a healthy and cost-effective ingredient.
In this study, dried grape (Cabernet sauvignon) pomace (DGP) as a by-product of wine production was used in the chocolate spread (CS) instead of various amounts of sugar and milk originated powders (MOP; skimmed milk and demineralized whey powder 1:1, w/w). The formulations of CS samples were determined using mixture design method. The sugar, MOP and DGP concentrations changed between 35 and 50, 0.066-8.000 and 0.23-15 g/100 g, respectively. According to the results, the consistency coefficient (K) and flow behavior index values of CS samples changed between 8.10 and 28.50 Pas.s(n) and 0.52-0.71, respectively. In addition, firmness and spreadability parameters were determined between 0.80-1.42 N and 2.15-4.24 N mm, respectively. Total phenolic content in CS samples ranged from 3415 to 13,754 mg GAE/kg and their digestibility ranged between 25% and 84%. Also, the digestibility of resveratrol was determined between 47.6% and 95.7% at different DGP concentrations. All of the established models successfully described the relation with R-2 values higher than 0.800. Textural and rheological parameters as well as sensory characteristics of the samples indicated that DGP may be used as a healthy and low-cost ingredient in CS formulation to partially substitute sugar and MOP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据