4.5 Article

Spatial heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and the risk for misclassification of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 91-98

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.012

关键词

Non-small cell lung cancer; Immunotherapy; Pembrolizumab; PD-L1; Biopsy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Intra-tumor heterogeneity for PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might lead to inaccurate stratification of patients to immunotherapy. The purpose of this research was to quantitate the effect of different factors on the risk of inaccurate diagnosis of PD-L1 expression. Methods: MATLAB software was used to model tumor with a different fraction, distribution and clustering of PD L1 protein expression and their effect on false positive and negative diagnosis in subsets of the modeled tumor (representing biopsies). Additionally, we evaluated the agreement between PD-L1 status in random segments and whole slides of PD-L1 stained clinical NSCLC cases. Results: Our computer-based model showed a significant increase in error rate when the fraction of PD-L1 positive cells was closer to the cut-off value (error rate of 33.33 %, 0.45 % and 0.74 % for PD-L1 positivity in 40-60%, <= 20 % and >= 80 % of tumor cells, respectively, P < 0.0001). In addition, biopsy size showed negative correlation with error rate (P < 0.0001) and larger clusters of PD-L1 positive cells were associated with higher error rate (P < 0.0001). Analysis of the clinical samples supported those of the computer-based model with higher error rate in cases with positive PD-L1 expression closer to the cutoff value. Based on our computerized model and clinical analysis, we developed a model to predict error rate based on biopsy size and the fraction of PD-L1 positive cells in the biopsy. Conclusion: Analysis of small biopsies for PD-L1 expression might be associated with significant error rate. The model presented can be used to identify cases with increased risk for error in whom interpretation of the test results should be made with caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据