4.7 Article

Electrospun poly-caprolactone/graphene oxide/quercetin nanofibrous scaffold for wound dressing: Evaluation of biological and structural properties

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118062

关键词

Synthetic polymers; Electrospinning; Polyphenols; Graphene oxide; Wound dressing

资金

  1. University of Tehran Science and Technology Park

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: In this study, for the first time, the effect of quercetin (Q) on the characteristic properties, antimicrobial activity, and cell viability of polycaprolactone (PCL)/graphene oxide (GO) electrospun scaffold was investigated. Main methods: Quercetin loaded graphene oxide nanoparticles have been incorporated into the poly-caprolactone solution, and their mixture has been electrospun to be applied as a nanofibrous scaffold for wound dressing and tissue engineering applications. The properties of scaffolds, like their morphology, tensile strength, hydrophilicity, and in vitro biological performance, are investigated. Key findings: The SEM micrographs reveal the uniform bead-free nanofibers with smooth structures have been successfully fabricated via the electrospinning procedure. The overall average of cell viability of NIH/3 T3 fibroblast cells on scaffolds is 95% that means the scaffolds have no toxicity, and FESEM shows cells attach and proliferate on scaffolds. Moreover, among all the fabricated scaffolds, the maximum release of quercetin belongs to PCL/GO/Q 0.5 with about 70% after 15 days, and this scaffold reduces bacterial growth by about 50% after 12 h shows the excellent effect of GO/Q on the antibacterial activity of PCL nanofibers. Significance: The results confirm that more than 1% of GO has some cytotoxicity, which limits its concentration; therefore, a second antibacterial agent is essential to improve the antibacterial activity of PCL/GO scaffold, and quercetin shows that it is an excellent candidate for this purpose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据