期刊
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 2869-2879出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06279-9
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; ACL; Reconstruction; Peroneus longus tendon; Fibularis longus tendon; Hamstring tendon; Autograft; Systematic review; Meta-analysis
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [81802208]
- program of China Scholarships Council
The study aimed to compare the functional outcomes and graft survival rates between peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft and hamstring tendon (HT) autograft for ACL reconstruction. Results showed that PLT autograft had similar functional outcomes and graft survival rates compared to HT autograft, with PLT group demonstrating better Lysholm score and IKDC subjective score.
Purpose This review aimed to assess whether peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft would have comparable functional outcomes and graft survival rates when compared to hamstring tendon (HT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid (MEDICINE), and EMBASE databases were queried for original articles from clinical studies including the keywords: ACL reconstruction and PLT autograft. Studies comparing PLT autograft versus HT autograft were included in this analysis and the following data were extracted from studies meeting the inclusion criteria: graft diameter, functional outcomes (Tegner activity scale, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score), knee laxity (Lachman test), and complications (donor site pain or paresthesia, graft failure). Besides, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) pre-operation and at last follow-up were also compared among patients using PLT autograft. Meta-analysis was applied using Review Manager 5.3 andp < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Twenty-three studies including 925 patients with ACL reconstruction met inclusion criteria. Of these, 5 studies included a direct comparison of PLT autograft (164 patients) versus HT autograft (174 patients). No significant difference was observed between PLT and HT autografts for Tegner activity scale, Lachman test, donor site pain, or graft failure. However, PLT groups demonstrated better Lysholm score (mean difference between PLT and HT groups, 1.55; 95% CI 0.20-2.89;p = 0.02) and IKDC subjective score (mean difference between PLT and HT groups, 3.24; 95% CI 0.29-6.19;p = 0.03). No difference of FADI was found (n.s.) but AOFAS was slightly decreased at last post-operative follow-up for patients with PLT autograft compared with pre-operative scores (mean difference of 0.31, 95% CI 0.07-0.54,p = 0.01). Conclusion PLT autograft demonstrated comparable functional outcomes and graft survival rates compared with HT autograft for ACL reconstruction. However, a slight decrease in AOFAS score should be considered during surgical planning. Hence, the PLT is a suitable autograft harvested outside the knee for ACL reconstruction to avoid the complication of quadriceps-hamstring imbalance which can occur when harvesting autografts from the knee.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据