4.3 Article

All-trans retinoid acid promotes allogeneic corneal graft survival in mice by regulating Treg-Th17 balance in the presence of TGF-β

期刊

BMC IMMUNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12865-015-0082-3

关键词

All-trans retinoid acid; TGF-beta; Th17 cells; Regulatory T cells; Corneal transplantation

资金

  1. National Natural Science [81020108017, 81270014]
  2. Shanghai Technology Phospherus Program [11QA1401000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: All-trans retinoid acid (ATRA) has been proven to skew Regulatory T cell-T helper 17 cell (Treg-Th17) balance toward Treg in vitro, favoring graft acceptance. However, its in vivo effect after solid organ transplantation is under investigation. Results: BALB/c mice were given orthotopic corneal grafts from C57BL/6 donors, and recipient mice were administered with ATRA, TGF-beta, and the combination of both agents for 8 weeks after surgery. We found that a mixed treatment of ATRA and TGF-beta significantly promoted graft survival. Moreover, with the presence of TGF-beta, ATRA upregulated CD4 (+)CD25(+) Foxp3(+) Treg cells and suppressed Th17 cells in the blood, spleen and draining lymph nodes of recipient mice, as well as enhanced the Foxp3 expression and inhibited the RORyt expression in grafts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Simultaneously, increased number of Foxp3+ cells and decreased number of IL-17+ cells in conjunctiva were found in recipients with mixed treatment, along with reduced IL-17 level in serum and aqueous humor and increased IL-10 level in aqueous humor. Tregs isolated from recipient mice treated with ATRA + TGF-beta presented the strongest suppressive activity in vitro. Conclusions: Combined application of ATRA and TGF-beta may shift the Th17-Treg balance toward Tregs, hence facilitating the induction of immunological tolerance after allogenic corneal transplantation and representing a potential therapeutic approach in the treatment of posttransplant rejection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据