4.1 Editorial Material

Pleural effusion with arm, breast, and face edema as a complication of subclavian vein catheterization and arteriovenous fistula in a patient after renal transplantation: A therapeutic approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1017-1020

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1129729820961959

关键词

Pleural effusion; upper limb edema; subclavian vein catheterization; arteriovenous fistula; dilator-assisted fistula banding; renal transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this case, a 52-year-old woman developed unilateral pleural effusion and massive edema of the upper limb, breast, and face after renal transplantation. Extensive vein occlusion and high venous flow from arteriovenous fistula were identified as the causes of impaired venous drainage, with fistula ligation and blood flow reduction ultimately resolving the issues. This case highlights the importance of careful consideration and multiple treatment attempts in managing complications after renal transplantation.
A 52-year-old woman after renal transplantation developed unilateral pleural effusion as well as a massive edema of the upper limb, breast, and face as a complication of the subclavian vein catheterization and arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. We revealed that impaired venous drainage due to extensive vein occlusion after temporary catheter insertion, together with high venous flow from the arteriovenous fistula, were the explanation. Because of moderately impaired renal graft function and limited availability of vascular access in the patient, fistula ligation as a therapeutic method described in literature, was not an option in our case. The patient underwent an unsuccessful attempt of venous angioplasty, and eventually banding of the fistula and blood flow reduction resolved pleural effusions and edema. This is a reasonable approach to the problem of massive upper torso edema due to central vein occlusion with ipsilateral arteriovenous fistula.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据