4.4 Review

Surface Texturing of Prosthetic Hip Implant Bearing Surfaces: A Review

期刊

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4048409

关键词

surface texture; lubrication; hip implant; artificial joints; bio-tribology

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [1R03AR066826-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Total hip replacement surgeries are common in the United States to treat degenerative joint diseases, but the limited longevity of implants remains a significant issue. Innovations in materials and coatings have helped reduce wear, but there is still a need to improve longevity through texture features and manufacturing techniques.
More than 300,000 total hip replacement surgeries are performed in the United States each year to treat degenerative joint diseases that cause pain and disability. The statistical survivorship of these implants declines significantly after 15-25 years of use because wear debris causes inflammation, osteolysis, and mechanical instability of the implant. This limited longevity has unacceptable consequences, such as revision surgery to replace a worn implant, or surgery postponement, which leaves the patient in pain. Innovations such as highly cross-linked polyethylene and new materials and coatings for the femoral head have reduced wear significantly, but longevity remains an imminent problem. Another method to reduce wear is to add a patterned microtexture composed of micro-sized texture features to the smooth bearing surfaces. We critically review the literature on textured orthopedic biomaterial surfaces in the context of prosthetic hip implants. We discuss the different functions of texture features by highlighting experimental and simulated results documented by research groups active in this area. We also discuss and compare different manufacturing techniques to create texture features on orthopedic biomaterial surfaces and emphasize the key difficulties that must be overcome to produce textured prosthetic hip implants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据