4.0 Article

Testing independence and goodness-of-fit jointly for functional linear models

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 380-402

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s42952-020-00083-4

关键词

Functional linear model; Generalized distance covariance; Goodness-of-fit; Independence test; Strong negative type space

资金

  1. NSFC [11771032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A conventional regression model for functional data requires the relationship between the predictor function and the response variable to be expressed. Two assumptions regarding independence between predictor function and error, as well as a functional linear model for the relationship, are usually added to the model. A test procedure based on generalized distance covariance is developed to check these assumptions simultaneously, showing consistent performance against alternatives.
A conventional regression model for functional data involves expressing a response variable in terms of the predictor function. Two assumptions, that (i) the predictor function and the error are independent and (ii) the relationship between the response variable and the predictor function takes functional linear model, are usually added to the model. Checking the validation of these two assumptions is fundamental to statistic inference and practical applications. We develop a test procedure to check these assumptions simultaneously based on generalized distance covariance. We establish the asymptotic theory for the proposed test under null and alternative hypotheses, and provide a bootstrap procedure to obtain the critical value of the test. The proposed test is consistent against all alternatives provided that the semimetrics related to the generalized distance are strong negative, and can be readily generalized to other functional regression models. We explore the finite sample performance of the proposed test by using both simulations and real data examples. The results illustrate that the proposed method has favorable performance compared with the competing method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据