4.8 Article

Single-Atom Co-N4 Electrocatalyst Enabling Four-Electron Oxygen Reduction with Enhanced Hydrogen Peroxide Tolerance for Selective Sensing

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 142, 期 39, 页码 16861-16867

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c07790

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2018YFE0200800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21790390, 21790391, 21790393, 21874139, 21775151, 21790053]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB30000000]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2018YFA0703501, 2016YFA0200104]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrocatalysis of the four-electron oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) provides a promising approach for energy conversion, storage, and oxygen monitoring. However, it is always accompanied by the reduction of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) on most employed catalysts, which brings down the electrocatalytic selectivity. Here, we report a single-atom Co-N-4 electrocatalyst for the four-electron ORR at an onset potential of 0.68 V (vs RHE) in neutral media while with high H2O2 tolerance, outperforming commercial Pt electrocatalysts. Electrochemical kinetic analysis confirms that the Co-N-4 catalytic sites dominantly promote the direct four-electron pathway of the ORR rather than the two sequential two-electron reduction pathways with H2O2 as the intermediate. Density functional theory calculations reveal that H2O2 reduction is hampered by the weak adsorption of H2O2 on the porphyrin-like Co centers. This endows the electrocatalyst with improved resistance to current interference from H2O2, enabling highly selective O-2 sensing as validated by the reliable sensing performance in vivo. Our study demonstrates the intriguing advantage of single-atom catalysts with high capacity for tailoring metal-adsorbate interactions, broadening their applications in environmental and life monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据