4.8 Article

Bicyclobutane Carboxylic Amide as a Cysteine-Directed Strained Electrophile for Selective Targeting of Proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 142, 期 43, 页码 18522-18531

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c07490

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI grant [JP17H06349, JP17K15483, 19H02854, JP15H05955]
  2. AMED [JP18am0101091, JP20ak0101121]
  3. JSPS
  4. World Premier International Research Center Initiative, Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H02854] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expanding the repertoire of electrophiles with unique reactivity features would facilitate the development of covalent inhibitors with desirable reactivity profiles. We herein introduce bicyclo[1.1.0]butane (BCB) carboxylic amide as a new class of thiol-reactive electrophiles for selective and irreversible inhibition of targeted proteins. We first streamlined the synthetic routes to generate a variety of BCB amides. The strain-driven nucleophilic addition to BCB amides proceeded chemoselectively with cysteine thiols under neutral aqueous conditions, the rate of which was significantly slower than that of acrylamide. This reactivity profile of BCB amide was successfully exploited to develop covalent ligands targeting Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). By tuning BCB amide reactivity and optimizing its disposition on the ligand, we obtained a selective covalent inhibitor of BTK. The in-gel activity-based protein profiling and mass spectrometry-based chemical proteomics revealed that the selected BCB amide had a higher target selectivity for BTK in human cells than did a Michael acceptor probe. Further chemical proteomic study revealed that BTK probes bearing different classes of electrophiles exhibited distinct off-target profiles. This result suggests that incorporation of BCB amide as a cysteine-directed electrophile could expand the capability to develop covalent inhibitors with the desired proteome reactivity profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据