4.8 Article

Synthesis of a Copper 1,3,5-Triamino-2,4,6-benzenetriol Metal-Organic Framework

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 142, 期 43, 页码 18346-18354

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c02389

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government [2014R1A5A1009799, 2017M3A7B4049172, 2017R1A2B4008286]
  2. Outstanding Research Fund of UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science Technology) [1.180066.01]
  3. KISTI [KSC-2017-C2-0053]
  4. [IBS-R019-D1]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [4120200113607, 2017M3A7B4049172, 2017R1A2B4008286, 2014R1A5A1009799] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the synthesis and characterization of a two-dimensional (2D) MX2Y2-type (M = metal, X, Y = N, S, O, and X not equal Y) copper 1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-benzenetriol metal-organic framework (Cu-3(TABTO)(2)-MOF). The role of oxygen in the synthesis of this MOF was investigated. Copper metal is formed along with the MOF when the synthesis is done in argon as suggested by XRD. When the reaction was exposed to air with vigorous stirring, copper metal was not observed by XRD. However, if there is no stirring, then copper metal is formed, and we learned that this is because oxygen was not allowed to enter the solvent due to the formation of a MOF film at the air/water interface. For the sample synthesized in argon (Cu-3(TABTO)(2)-Ar), an insulating Cu-3(TABTO)(2)-Ar pellet (sigma < 10(-10) S cm(-1)) became a metallic conductor with an electrical conductivity of 0.78 S cm(-1) at 300 K after exposure to iodine vapor. This work provides further insights into the role of oxygen in the synthesis of redox-active ligand-based MOFs, expands the family of 2D redox-active ligand-based electrically conductive MOFs, and offers more opportunities in sensing, photocatalytic, electronic, and energy-related applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据