4.5 Article

Temporal and spatial dependence of a yearlong record of sound propagation from the Canada Basin to the Chukchi Shelf

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 148, 期 3, 页码 1663-1680

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0001970

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research Ocean Acoustics Program [N00014-15-1-2144, N00014-15-1-2119, N00014-15-1-2017, N00014-15-1-2068, N00014-15-1-2110, N00014-19-1-2721, N00014-15-1-2898, N00014-15-1-2806, N00014-18-1-2140, ONR OA322]
  2. ONR Arctic and Global Prediction Program [ONR AG322, N00014-15-1-2782]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Pacific Arctic Region has experienced decadal changes in atmospheric conditions, seasonal sea-ice coverage, and thermohaline structure that have consequences for underwater sound propagation. To better understand Arctic acoustics, a set of experiments known as the deep-water Canada Basin acoustic propagation experiment and the shallow-water Canada Basin acoustic propagation experiment was conducted in the Canada Basin and on the Chukchi Shelf from summer 2016 to summer 2017. During the experiments, low-frequency signals from five tomographic sources located in the deep basin were recorded by an array of hydrophones located on the shelf. Over the course of the yearlong experiment, the surface conditions transitioned from completely open water to fully ice-covered. The propagation conditions in the deep basin were dominated by a subsurface duct; however, over the slope and shelf, the duct was seen to significantly weaken during the winter and spring. The combination of these surface and subsurface conditions led to changes in the received level of the sources that exceeded 60 dB and showed a distinct spacio-temporal dependence, which was correlated with the locations of the sources in the basin. This paper seeks to quantify the observed variability in the received signals through propagation modeling using spatially sparse environmental measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据