4.5 Article

Ozonolysis of wheat bran in subcritical water for enzymatic saccharification and polysaccharide recovery

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2020.105092

关键词

Pretreatment; Acidic hydrolysis; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Structural changes; Fractionation

资金

  1. National Top Youth Talent for Grain Industry of China [LQ2016301]
  2. National First-class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology [JUFSTR20180203]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By studying different pretreatment methods for wheat bran, it was found that sequential combination of ozonolysis and subcritical water showed a synergistic effect, significantly improving the enzymatic digestion and hemicellulose solubilization of wheat bran, providing new possibilities for wheat bran biorefinery.
The destarched wheat bran was pretreated with ozonolysis, subcritical water (SW), and their combinations to improve its enzymatic digestion and hemicellulose solubilization. Ozonolysis caused lignin destructions and partial leach of hemicelluloses, leading to the formation of oxalic acids. Taking advantage of these effects, the sequential combinations of ozonolysis and SW showed synergy, resulting in a 3-fold hydrolysis outcome relative to the individual SW treatment. Eventually, the combined pretreatment achieved a high hemicellulose removal (86%) and saccharification yield (85% for glucose) under a mild SW condition (160 degrees C for 30 min). Apart from morphological destructions, FTIR and TGA results indicated different structural changes caused by ozonolysis and SW. Hemicellulose was shown as the major factor hindering enzymatic hydrolysis. Additionally, the soluble polysaccharides generated by these pretreatments were characterized, showing that the single SW pretreatment was better for polysaccharide recovery. These findings may help to maximize the benefits of wheat bran biorefinery. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据