4.6 Article

Understanding the gut instinct of expert coaches during talent identification

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 359-367

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1823083

关键词

Decision-making; instinct; intuition; ecological dynamics; coach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coaches primarily rely on intuition in talent identification in sports, which is formed through years of experience, time spent with athletes, and decision context. When selecting athletes, coaches may be more inclined to consider their own ability to improve certain athletes.
Coaches are an integral part of talent identification in sport and are often used as the gold standard against which scientific methods of talent identification are compared. However, their decision-making during this process is not well understood. In this article, we use an ecological approach to explore talent identification in combat sports. We interviewed twenty-four expert, international-level coaches from the Olympic disciplines of boxing, judo, and taekwondo (age: 48.7 + 7.5 years; experience: 20.8 + 8.3 years). Findings indicated that when coaches identify talent they rely on gut instinct: intuitive judgements made without conscious thought, used to direct attention to particular athletes or characteristics. Our analysis revealed four major contributors to coaches' intuition: experiential knowledge, temporal factors, seeing athletes in context, and what can be worked with. Our findings demonstrate that i) athlete selections may be influenced by the coaches' perceived ability to improve certain athletes (rather than solely on athlete ability); and ii) instinctual decisions are the result of years of experience, time spent with the athlete, and the context surrounding the decision. Based on these findings, we recommend that future research focuses on the duration and conditions that are required for coaches to confidently and reliably identify talented athletes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据