4.7 Article

Structure system estimation under seismic excitation with an adaptive extended kalman filter

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 489, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115690

关键词

Extended kalman filter; Process noise adaptation; System estimation; Seismic response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An adaptive extended Kalman filter (EKF) with two computation modes is proposed for system estimation of civil engineering structures under seismic excitations. The KF, in general, requires the process noise covariance matrix, which defines the uncertainty of the system model used in the filter, to be set appropriately. However, process noise is usually not known in practice, and tuning process noise in a trial-and-error manner can be time consuming and subjective; unsuccessful tuning can even result in divergence of the filter. In this study, the Robbins-Monro (RM) algorithm is combined with an EKF to adjust process noise automatically. Two computation modes, corresponding to time-invariant and time-varying parameter identification, are employed in the EKF-RM method. The RM algorithm makes the EKF-RM method robust and practical. In this study, the EKF-RM method is first numerically investigated with a simplified four-degrees-of-freedom (4-DOF) lumped mass model based on a real civil structure. In addition, the parameter variation tracking capability of the method is also studied by employing the 4-DOF lumped mass model. Further, the EKF-RM method is validated by two shaking table experiments from the Edefense database, including a full-scale four-story building experiment and a substructure experiment. Time-invariant system parameters are identified for the four-story building. Modal frequencies computed using the identified parameters are compared with the modal analysis results. Time-varying parameter identification is demonstrated by using the substructure experiment, which reveals strong nonlinearity. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据