4.6 Editorial Material

Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England

期刊

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 E720-E727

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa172

关键词

food environment; foodscape; field validity; spatial accuracy

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research [PD-SPH-2015]
  2. Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. National Institute for Health Research [ES/G007462/1]
  7. Wellcome Trust of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration [087636/Z/08/Z]
  8. Medical Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit. The results showed a sensitivity of 89% and a Positive Predictive Value of 95%, with a mean difference in geographical coordinates of 110 meters.
Background The study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit. Methods A field audit was conducted in five Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the North East of England. LSOAs were purposively selected from the top and bottom quintiles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation and from urban and rural areas. The FHRS data validity against the field data was measured as Positive Predictive Values (PPV) and sensitivity. Spatial accuracy was evaluated via mean difference in straight line distances between the FHRS coordinates and the field coordinates. Results In all, 182 premises were present in the field, of which 162 were in the FHRS data giving a sensitivity of 89%. Eight outlets recorded in the FHRS data were absent in the field, giving a PPV of 95%.The mean difference in the geographical coordinates of the field audit compared to the FHRS was 110 m, and Conclusions After an evaluation of the validity and spatial accuracy of the FHRS data, the results suggest that it is a useful dataset for surveillance of the food environment and for intervention evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据