4.7 Article

Lysine and Arginine Protein Post-translational Modifications by Enhanced DIA Libraries: Quantification in Murine Liver Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 4163-4178

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00685

关键词

post-translational modifications; methylation; acetylation; succinylation; data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS); peptidoforms; spectral library; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01DK107288]
  2. NIH [GM110174, AI118891]
  3. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion Grant MINECO [SAF 2017-88041-R]
  4. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion Grant ISCiii [PIE14/00031 CIBERehd-ISCiii]
  5. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion Grant Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditation [SEV-2016-0644]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteoforms containing post-translational modifications (PTMs) represent a degree of functional diversity only harnessed through analytically precise simultaneous quantification of multiple PTMs. Here we present a method to accurately differentiate an unmodified peptide from its PTM-containing counterpart through data-independent acquisition-mass spectrometry, leveraging small precursor mass windows to physically separate modified peptidoforms from each other during MS2 acquisition. We utilize a lysine and arginine PTM-enriched peptide assay library and site localization algorithm to simultaneously localize and quantify seven PTMs including mono-, di-, and trimethylation, acetylation, and succinylation in addition to total protein quantification in a single MS run without the need to enrich experimental samples. To evaluate biological relevance, this method was applied to liver lysate from differentially methylated nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mouse models. We report that altered methylation and acetylation together with total protein changes drive the novel hypothesis of a regulatory function of PTMs in protein synthesis and mRNA stability in NASH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据