4.4 Article

Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.005

关键词

Acellular dermal matrix; Implant-based breast reconstruction; Expander-implant-based breast reconstruction; Patient-reported outcomes; Evidence-based algorithm; Mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01CA152192]
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify patient subgroups where acellular dermal matrix (ADM) improved clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in expander-implant-based breast reconstruction. Results showed that ADM was associated with a greater risk of major complications, particularly in high-BMI patients, and no significant improvement in patient satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and physical well-being. This suggests a more critical approach to the use of ADM in expander-implant reconstruction may be necessary.
Background: Although acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is widely used in expander-implant-based breast reconstructions, previous analyses have been unable to demonstrate improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with this approach over non-ADM procedures. This study aims to develop a more selective, evidence-based approach to the use of ADM in expander-implant-based breast reconstruction by identifying patient subgroups in which ADM improved clinical outcomes and PROs. Study design: The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study prospectively evaluated immediate expander-implant reconstructions at 11 centers from 2012 to 2015. Complications (any/overall and major), and PROs (satisfaction, physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) were assessed two years postoperatively using medical records and the BREAST-Q, respectively. Using mixed-models accounting for centers and with interaction terms, we analyzed for differential ADM effects across various clinical subgroups, including age, body mass index, radiation timing, and chemotherapy. Results: Expander-implant-based breast reconstruction was performed in 1451 patients, 738 with and 713 without ADM. Major complication risk was higher in ADM users vs. nonusers (22.9% vs. 16.4% and p = 0.04). Major complication risk with ADM increased with higher BMI (BMI=30, OR=1.70; BMI=35, OR=2.29, interaction p = 0.02). No significant ADM effects were observed for breast satisfaction, psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being within any subgroups. Conclusion: In immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction, ADM was associated with a greater risk of major complications, particularly in high-BMI patients. We were unable to identify patient subgroups where ADM was associated with significant improvements in PROs. Given these findings and the financial costs of ADM, a more critical approach to the use of ADM in expander-implant reconstruction may be warranted. (C) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据