4.5 Article

Mapping coral reefs using consumer-grade drones and structure from motion photogrammetry techniques

期刊

CORAL REEFS
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 269-275

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-016-1522-0

关键词

Drone mapping; Coral reefs; Bathymetry from drones; Structure from motion underwater; Bathymetry from photogrammetry

资金

  1. Institutional Strategy of the University of Bremen
  2. German Excellence Initiative [ABPZuK-03/2014]
  3. ZMT, the Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine Ecology, Bremen
  4. US National Science Foundation [OCE1435133, OCE1236905, OCE1637396]
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1435133] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a novel technique to measure the small-scale three-dimensional features of a shallow-water coral reef using a small drone equipped with a consumer-grade camera, a handheld GPS and structure from motion (SfM) algorithms. We used a GoPro HERO4 with a modified lens mounted on a DJI Phantom 2 drone (maximum total take-off weight < 2 kg) to perform a 10 min flight and collect 306 aerial images with an overlap equal or greater than 90%. We mapped an area of 8380 m(2), obtaining as output an ortho-rectified aerial photomosaic and a bathymetric digital elevation model (DEM) with a resolution of 0.78 and 1.56 cm pixel(-1), respectively. Through comparison with airborne LiDAR data for the same area, we verified that the location of the ortho-rectified aerial photomosaic is accurate within similar to 1.4 m. The bathymetric difference between our DEM and the LiDAR dataset is -0.016 +/- 0.45 m (1 sigma). Our results show that it is possible, in conditions of calm waters, low winds and minimal sun glint, to deploy consumer-grade drones as a relatively low-cost and rapid survey technique to produce multispectral and bathymetric data on shallow-water coral reefs. We discuss the utility of such data to monitor temporal changes in topographic complexity of reefs and associated biological processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据