4.6 Review

Microbiota-derived metabolites as diagnostic markers for respiratory fungal infections

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113473

关键词

Microbiota; Fungal infection; Aspergillus; Biomarkers; VOCs; Diagnosis

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/SAU-SER/29635/2017, PTDC/MED-GEN/28778/2017]
  2. FCT [UIDB/50026/2020, UIDP/50026/2020, LCF/PR/HP17/52190003, SFRH/BD/136814/2018, CEECIND/03628/2017, CEECIND/04058/2018]
  3. Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, throughthe European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000013, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000023]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [847507]
  5. la Caixa Foundation [100010434]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/136814/2018] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An emerging body of evidence has highlighted the significant role of the pulmonary microbiota during respiratory infections. The individual microbiome is nowadays recognized to supervise the outcome of the host-pathogen interaction by orchestrating mechanisms of immune regulation, inflammation, metabolism, and other physiological processes. A shift in the normal flora of the respiratory tract is associated with several lung inflammatory disorders including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cystic fibrosis. These diseases are characterized by a lung microenvironment that becomes permissive to infections caused by the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Although the role of the lung microbiota in the pathophysiology of respiratory fungal diseases remains elusive, microbiota-derived components have been proposed as important biomarkers to be considered in the diagnosis of these severe infections. Here, we review this emerging area of research and discuss the potential of microbiota-derived products in the diagnosis of respiratory fungal diseases. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据