4.1 Article

Does the Use of Computer-Assisted Surgery Affect the Margin Status in Resections of Ameloblastoma?

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 79, 期 7, 页码 1467-1473

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the use of computer-assisted surgery did not compromise the margin status in surgical resections of ameloblastoma. There were fewer instances of close or positive margins in the CAS group compared to the non-CAS group, suggesting that CAS could potentially decrease the occurrence of close or positive margins.
Purpose: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) was implemented rapidly, and recent concerns have been raised regarding its safety and its effect on surgical outcomes. We wanted to understand the impact CAS has on the surgical margin status when used for the resection of ameloblastoma. Materials and Methods: We performed a 10-year retrospective cohort study at a single institution. Sub-jects were identified by surgical logs and chart query. Histopathologic reports were examined for margin status. We compared surgical technique (CAS and non-CAS) with the surgical margin (<= 5 mm vs >5 mm). Other variable outcomes included previous treatment, histologic type, time from imaging to surgery, and recurrence. Bivariate analysis was performed to determine significance. Results: A total of 31 subjects were identified (12 females; 19 males) with a mean age of 34.5 (standard deviation [SD] +/- 19.1) years. Fifteen subjects were included in the CAS group and 16 subjects in the non-CAS group. No statistically significant difference was identified between the CAS and non-CAS group when surgical margins were defined as less than or equal to 5 mm and greater than 5 mm (P = .5368). The average distance from surgical margin to lesion was 9.6 mm (SD +/- 5.1) in the CAS group and 8.5 mm (SD +/- 5.6) in the non-CAS group (P = .2590). However, the non-CAS group had 1 positive margin and a total of 6 margins of less than or equal to 2 mm compared with zero margins of less than or equal to 2 mm in the CAS group (closest margin 3 mm). Conclusions: The use of CAS and cutting guides based on predetermined surgical margins did not compromise the margin status in surgical resections of ameloblastoma. The use of CAS could potentially decrease the occurrence of close or positive margins. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据