4.8 Review

Functionalized carbon nanoparticles: Syntheses and applications in optical bioimaging and energy conversion

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 66-81

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.02.017

关键词

Functionalized nanoparticles; Carbon dots; Fluorescence; Optical imaging; Charge transfer; Energy conversion

资金

  1. NIH [R15GM114752]
  2. Topnotch Young Talents Program of China
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  4. Air Force Research Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are known for their unique optical properties. In recent years, carbon nanomaterials of surface and/or structural defects have been found to exhibit similar properties after functionalization in various schemes. Among these carbon-based QDs are carbon dots, which are generally defined as small carbon nanoparticles with surface passivation. In fact, carbon dots now represent a rapidly advancing and expanding research field. As measured by the optical properties of carbon dots, the most effective passivation has been the surface functionalization of carbon nanoparticles with organic or polymeric molecules, corresponding to much brighter fluorescence emissions across the visible spectrum and extending into the near-IR. Therefore, carbon dots have been pursued extensively for potential bioimaging and other biomedical applications. The mechanistic framework for carbon dots includes photoinduced redox processes, similar to those found in conventional semiconductor QDs. As a result, carbon dots have also been pursued for their photocatalytic functions. In this article on surface-functionalized carbon nanoparticles or carbon dots, their representative syntheses and demonstrated properties and their potential uses as high-performance yet nontoxic fluorescence probes for bioimaging in vitro and in vivo are highlighted, so is their serving as potent photocatalysts in energy conversion applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据