4.7 Article

18F-FLT PET/CT Adds Value to 18F-FDG PET/CT for Diagnosing Relapse After Definitive Radiotherapy in Patients with Lung Cancer: Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 62, 期 5, 页码 628-635

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.247742

关键词

lung cancer; radiotherapy; relapse; F-18-FDG PET/CT; F-18-FLT PET/CT

资金

  1. Danish Cancer Society [R134-A8543-15-S42]
  2. Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diagnosing relapse after radiotherapy for lung cancer is challenging. While F-18-FLT PET/CT demonstrated higher specificity for malignancy than F-18-FDG PET, the sensitivity was lower. The addition of F-18-FLT PET/CT improved diagnostic value, particularly after conventional fractionated radiotherapy.
Diagnosing relapse after radiotherapy for lung cancer is challenging. The specificity of both CT and F-18-FDG PET/CT is low because of radiation-induced changes. 3'-deoxy-3'-F-18-fluorothymidine (F-18-FLT) PET has previously demonstrated higher specificity for malignancy than F-18-FDG PET. We investigated the value of F-18-FLT PET/CT for diagnosing relapse in irradiated lung cancer. Methods: Patients suspected of relapse of lung cancer after definitive radiotherapy (conventional fractionated radiotherapy [cRT] or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) were included. Sensitivity and specificity were analyzed both within the irradiated high-dose volume (HDV) and on a patient basis. Marginal differences and interobserver agreement were assessed. Results: Sixty-three patients who had received radiotherapy in 70 HDVs (34 cRT; 36 SBRT) were included. The specificity of F-18-FLT PET/CT was higher than that of F-18-FDG PET/CT (HDV, 96% [95% CI, 87-100] vs. 71% [95% CI, 57-83] [P 5 0.0039]; patient-based, 90% [95% CI, 73-98] vs. 55% [95% CI, 36-74] [P = 0.0020]). The difference in specificity between F-18-FLT PET/CT and F-18-FDG PET/CT was higher after cRT than after SBRT. The sensitivity of F-18-FLT PET/CT was lower than that of F-18-FDG PET/CT (HDV, 69% [95% CI, 41-89] vs. 94% [95% CI, 70-100] [P = 0.1250]; patient-based, 70% [95% CI, 51-84] vs. 94% [95% CI, 80-99] [P = 0.0078]). Adding F-18-FLT PET/CT when F-18-FDG PET/CT was positive or inconclusive improved the diagnostic value compared with F-18-FDG PET/CT alone. In cRT HDVs, the probability of malignancy increased from 67% for F-18-FDG PET/CT alone to 100% when both tracers were positive. Conclusion: F-18-FLT PET/CT adds diagnostic value to F-18-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected relapse. The diagnostic impact of F-18-FLT PET/CT was highest after cRT. We suggest adding F-18-FLT PET/CT when F-18-FDG PET/CT is inconclusive or positive within the previously irradiated volume to improve diagnostic value in patients for whom histologic confirmation is not easily obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据