4.6 Article

Peripheral immunophenotype in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease: an observational clinical study

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323603

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Research UK Clinical Research Fellowship
  2. Lewy Body Society [ARUK--CRF2014-2]
  3. University of Southampton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Inflammation plays a key role in the aetiology and progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the immunophenotype of the second most common neurodegenerative cause of dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), remains unclear. To date there have been no studies examining peripheral inflammation in DLB using multiplex immunoassay and flow cytometry concomitantly. We hypothesised that, using blood biomarkers, DLB would show an increased proinflammatory profile compared with controls, and that there would be a distinct profile compared with AD. Methods 93 participants (31 with DLB, 31 with AD and 31 healthy older controls) completed a single study visit for neuropsychiatric testing and phlebotomy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were quantified for T and B cell subsets using flow cytometry, and serum cytokine concentrations were measured using multiplex immunoassay. Results We detected reduced relative numbers of helper T cells and reduced activation of B cells in DLB compared with AD. Additionally, interleukin (IL)-1 beta was detected more frequently in DLB and the serum concentration of IL-6 was increased compared with controls. Conclusions Peripheral inflammation is altered in DLB compared with AD, with T cell subset analysis supporting a possible shift towards senescence of the adaptive immune system in DLB. Furthermore, there is a proinflammatory signature of serum cytokines in DLB. Identification of this unique peripheral immunophenotype in DLB could guide development of an immune-based biomarker and direct future work exploring potential immune modulation as a novel treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据