4.7 Article

Manipulating membrane surface porosity via deep insight into surfactants during nonsolvent induced phase separation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 611, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118358

关键词

Polymer membranes; Nonsolvent induced phase separation (NIPS); Membrane formation; Surfactant

资金

  1. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Tianjin [TD13-5044]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776216]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0403902]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) of Ministry of Education of China [IRT13084]
  5. Tianjin Key Laboratory Project, Tianjin, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonsolvent induced phase separation (NIPS) is a basic and classic method of preparing porous membranes. Surfactants have often been used to improve flux of porous membranes prepared by NIPS. However, not much have been reported on systematically using surfactants to control surface pore formation. Herein, the interface intermedia role of surfactants, a new understanding of the pore-making role of surfactants in NIPS, is used to tailor the surface pore of porous membrane. By controlling the known hydrophilic interaction between the hydrophilic head of surfactant and solvent, hydrophilic additive, etc., the hydrophobic interaction between hydrophobic polymer and surfactant can be varied with the hydrophobic tail of surfactant. We find that the hydrophobic interaction, represented by the compatibility between hydrophobic polymer and the hydrophobic tail of surfactant, has a vital effect on the NIPS process. As a result, this method greatly increases the surface porosity (up to 22%), optimizes the pore size distribution, and finally improves the pure water flux of polymer membranes (10-fold increase, maximally). More importantly, it has no obvious adverse effect on the mechanical strength of polymer membranes and can be extended to various polymer materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据