4.5 Article

Association between a 46-SNP Polygenic Risk Score and melanoma risk in Dutch patients with familial melanoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 58, 期 11, 页码 760-766

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107251

关键词

polymorphism; genetic; dermatology; genetic predisposition to disease; genetic testing; neoplasms

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [UL 2015--7511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that a melanoma-specific Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) is significantly associated with melanoma risk in patients with genetically unexplained familial melanoma, indicating the importance of PRS in determining melanoma susceptibility in such families. Further exploration of the diagnostic value of PRS in genetically unexplained melanoma families is encouraged.
Background Familial clustering of melanoma suggests a shared genetic predisposition among family members, but only 10%-40% of familial cases carry a pathogenic variant in a known high-risk melanoma susceptibility gene. We investigated whether a melanoma-specific Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) is associated with melanoma risk in patients with genetically unexplained familial melanoma. Methods Dutch familial melanoma cases (n=418) were genotyped for 46 SNPs previously identified as independently associated with melanoma risk. The 46-SNP PRS was calculated and standardised to 3423 healthy controls (sPRS) and the association between PRS and melanoma risk was modelled using logistic regression. Within the case series, possible differences were further explored by investigating the PRS in relation to (1) the number of primary melanomas in a patient and (2) the extent of familial clustering of melanoma. Results The PRS was significantly associated with melanoma risk, with a per-SD OR of 2.12 (95% CI 1.90 to 2.35, p<0.001), corresponding to a 5.70-fold increased risk (95% CI 3.93 to 8.28) when comparing the top 90th to the middle 40-60th PRS percentiles. The mean PRS was significantly higher in cases with multiple primary melanomas than in cases with a single melanoma (sPRS 1.17 vs 0.71, p=0.001). Conversely, cases from high-density melanoma families had a lower (but non-significant) mean PRS than cases from low-density families (sPRS 0.60 vs 0.94, p=0.204). Conclusion Our work underlines the significance of a PRS in determining melanoma susceptibility and encourages further exploration of the diagnostic value of a PRS in genetically unexplained melanoma families.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据