4.5 Article

Enhanced magnetic signal along edges of embedded epitaxial La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 nanostructures

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167324

关键词

Nanomagnets; LSMO; Patterned magnetic thin films; XMCD-PEEM

资金

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Research Council of Norway [245963/F50]
  3. Norwegian Ph.D. Network on Nanotechnology for Microsystems
  4. Research Council of Norway, Division for Science [221860/F60]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of nanoscale patterning on ferromagnetic properties and film crystalline structure of epitaxial thin films of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3. Two different techniques are used to pattern the thin films, resulting in stronger magnetic dichroism signal along the edges of the embedded magnets near T-C and a reduction of in-plane lattice parameters. The discussion focuses on how in-plane stress from the nanomagnet surroundings affects the magnetic properties in these structures.
When thin films are patterned to realize nanoscale device geometries, maintaining their structural integrity is key to the quality of their functional properties. The introduction of new surfaces and interfaces by lateral modifications may alter material properties as well as the expected device functionality. In this study, two different techniques for nanoscale patterning of epitaxial thin films of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 are used to investigate the effects on their ferromagnetic properties and film crystalline structure. Nanomagnets are realized as free-standing structures and embedded ferromagnets in a paramagnetic matrix, respectively. We find that the magnetic dichroism signal in x-ray spectomicroscopy is stronger along the edges of the embedded magnets close to T-C. X-ray-diffraction measurements reveal a reduction of their in-plane lattice parameters. We discuss how in-plane stress from the nanomagnet surroundings can affect the magnetic properties in these structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据