4.4 Article

Three-way decision for incomplete real-valued data

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 7843-7862

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-201272

关键词

3WD; IRVDIS; Method; Decision-theoretic rough set; Gaussian kernel; Inclusion degree; Auto diagnostic

资金

  1. National Social Science Fund's Major Research Special Project [18VHQ013]
  2. China-ASEAN Institute for Innovation Governance and Intellectual Property Research [2019ZCY04]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Integration of Terrestrial and Marine Economies [2019YB22]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [2018GXNSFAA294134]
  5. Guangxi Science and Technology Program [2017AD23056]
  6. Funding of high-level innovation team and excellent scholar program of Guangxi universities [[2019] 52]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An information system (IS) is a database that expresses relationships between objects and attributes. An IS with decision attributes is said to be a decision information system (DIS). An incomplete real-valued decision information system (IRVDIS) is a DIS based on incomplete real-valued data. This paper studies three-way decision (3WD) for incomplete real-valued data and its application. In the first place, the distance between two objects on the basis of the conditional attribute set in an IRVDIS is constructed. In the next place, the fuzzy T-cos-equivalence relation on the object set of an IRVDIS is received by means of Gaussian kernel. After that, the decision-theoretic rough set model for an IRVDIS is presented. Furthermore, the 3WD method is proposed based on this model. Lastly, to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed method, an application of the proposed method is given. It is worth mentioning that levels of risk may be determined by thresholds that can be directly acquired according to risk preference of different decision-makers, as well as the decision rule for each decision class under different levels of risk is showed in tabular forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据