4.7 Article

The Nature and Clinical Significance of Atypical Mononuclear Cells in Infectious Mononucleosis Caused by the Epstein-Barr Virus in Children

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 223, 期 10, 页码 1699-1706

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa601

关键词

infectious mononucleosis; atypical mononuclear cells; Epstein-Barr virus; CD8 T cells; antibody microarray

资金

  1. Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education [AAAA-A18-118012390247-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atypical mononuclear cells (AM) appear in significant numbers in peripheral blood of patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated infectious mononucleosis (IM), primarily consisting of CD8(+) T cells and a small fraction of CD19(+) B lymphocytes. The AM population amount is significantly higher in children with mononucleosis caused by primary EBV infection compared to other viral infections, and the recovery from classic IM associated with primary EBV infection is correlated with the percentage of CD8(+) AM.
Atypical mononuclear cells (AM) appear in significant numbers in peripheral blood of patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated infectious mononucleosis (IM). We investigated the number and lineage-specific clusters of differentiation (CD) expression of atypical mononuclear cells in 110 children with IM using the anti-CD antibody microarray for panning leukocytes by their surface markers prior to morphology examination. The AM population consisted primarily of CD8(+) T cells with a small fraction (0%-2% of all lymphocytes) of CD19(+) B lymphocytes. AM amount in children with mononucleosis caused by primary EBV infection was significantly higher than for IM caused by EBV reactivation or other viruses and constituted 1%-53% of all peripheral blood mononuclear cells compared to 0%-11% and 0%-8%, respectively. Children failing to recover from classic IM associated with primary EBV infection within 6 months had significantly lower percentage of CD8(+) AM compared to patients with normal recovery rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据