4.7 Article

Safety and Immunogenicity of the Ad26.RSV.preF Investigational Vaccine Coadministered With an Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 223, 期 4, 页码 699-708

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa409

关键词

respiratory syncytial virus; vaccine; adenoviral vectors; RSV fusion protein; Pre-F protein; elderly

资金

  1. Janssen Vaccines Prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that coadministration of Ad26.RSV.preF and seasonal influenza vaccine in older adults is safe and effective, without interfering with immune response.
Background. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza cause significant disease burden in older adults. Overlapping RSV and influenza seasonality presents the opportunity to coadminister vaccines for both infections. This study assessed coadministration of the investigational vaccine, Ad26.RSV.preF, an adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vector encoding RSV F protein stabilized in its prefusion conformation (pre-F), with a seasonal influenza vaccine in older adults. Methods. In this phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 180 adults aged >= 60 years received Ad26.RSV.preF plus Fluarix on day 1 and placebo on day 29, or placebo plus Fluarix on day 1 and Ad26.RSV.preF on day 29 (control). Results. The coadministration regimen had an acceptable tolerability profile. Reactogenicity was generally higher after Ad26. RSV.preF versus Fluarix, but symptoms were generally transient and mild or moderate. At 28 days after the first vaccination, the upper confidence intervals of the hemagglutination inhibition antibody geometric mean ratio (control/coadministration) for all influenza strains were <2, demonstrating noninferiority. Robust neutralizing and binding antibody responses to RSV A2 were observed in both groups. Conclusions. Coadministration of Fluarix with Ad26.RSV.preF vaccine had an acceptable safety profile and showed no evidence of interference in immune response. The results are compatible with simultaneous seasonal vaccination with both vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据