4.5 Article

Subtidal variability of sea level in a macrotidal and convergent estuary

期刊

CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 28-41

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2016.11.005

关键词

Gironde Estuary; France; Subtidal water level; EOF; Macrotidal; Convergent

资金

  1. French Public Bank of Investment (BPI) URABAILA project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time series (2011 through 2013) of water level elevations measured at nine locations along the Gironde Estuary, on the southwest coast of France, were analyzed to investigate both propagation and forcing mechanisms of tidal and subtidal pulses. A Lanczos low pass filter (35 h) was applied to the three-year time series of water level from each tide gage station and the seasonal signal was removed. Both Regular (REOF) and Complex Empirical Orthogonal Function (CEOF) analyses were applied to the detrended water level to provide information on the spatial and temporal structure of the subtidal pulses. The explained variance of the first two dominant modes from both the REOF and CEOF analyses together explained 98% of the variance, with the first mode explaining similar to 90% and the second, similar to 8%. The spatial structure of the first two modes both showed amplitude amplification (0.2 cm/km for the first mode and 1 cm/km for the second) over the entire length of the estuary. A local phase minimum, derived from the CEOF analysis, was found at the mouth of the estuary for mode 1 and at the head of the estuary for mode 2. This indicated that the first mode was forced by coastal processes and the second mode by upstream (riverine) mechanisms. A numerical model of the Gironde estuary was used to help understand the forcing mechanism behind REOF and CEOF mode 1. The results of a numerical model simulation forced only with tides was compared to the spatial structure of the dominant REOF and CEOF mode, and verified that mode 1 was a product of tidal processes. The second mode resulted from variations in river flow linked to synoptic weather patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据