4.7 Article

Enhanced visible light photoelectrocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride by I and P co-doped TiO2 photoelectrode

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 406, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124309

关键词

I and P co-doped TiO2; Photoelectrocatalytic; Affecting factors; Degradation mechanism; Active species

资金

  1. Starting Research Fund of Xinxiang Medical University [505343]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21707115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study prepared I and P co-doped TiO2 materials for the first time, showing significantly improved photoelectrocatalytic activity. The highest activity was achieved when the doping content of P was 4 at% under visible light.
Elimination of antibiotics such as tetracycline hydrochloride (TC) from wastewater is of great significance, but still faces challenges. Herein, for the first time, I and P co-doped TiO2 catalysts were prepared via a hydrolysis method. We also reported a simple method to prepare I and P co-doped TiO2 photoelectrodes, which exhibited preeminent photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) performance for the decomposition of TC. The synergistic effect of I and P co-doping could significantly improve the charge separation rate and enhance the light absorption capacity of TiO2, leading to an enhancement of PEC activity. The main factors affecting the PEC performance were investigated, and the highest degradation rate constant (4.20 x 10(-2) min(-1)) was achieved when the doping content of P was 4 at% (ITP-4 photoelectrode) at pH 11.02 under visible light. The Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model and active species trapping experiments were selected to investigate the degradation mechanism of TC. The results suggest that the hydroxyl radicals and photogenerated holes were the main active species that were responsible for the decomposition of TC. Moreover, the degradation pathways of TC based on the intermediates also demonstrated that the hydroxyl radicals and holes showed a principal role in degrading TC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据